Welcome to friends of Liberty!
.: Home | Your Account | Submit News | Search | Topics | Top 10 :.
  Main Menu
· Home
· Advertising
· Calendar
· Feedback
· Forums
· IP_Tracking
· Members List
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Your Account
 

  Related Reading
 

  Media Center
DAILY NEWS


Tyranny Response Unit
Breaking News
CivilHomeLandDefense
Cryptome.org
ClandestineRadio
Deport Aliens
DXing.info
UnderReported.com
Hacktivismo.com
MilitaryCorruption.com
AllSouthWestNews
Freedom 21 Santa Cruz
Globalism News
BigEye.com
AP Top Headlines

AP National
AP Washington
AP International
AP Business
AP Wall Street
AME Info
BBC News
BBC

Bloomberg
Business News
Business Week
Capitalism Mag

CBS MarketWatch
Eaglesup
EUbusiness
Eastern Review
FinanceAsia.com
Financial Review
Financial Times

Forbes
Idaho Observer
IndependentSA

Intern Herald
Insight Mag

The Economist
Fast Company
Forbes
Fortune
Kiplinger's

Inc.com
Industry Week
Money
LewRockwell.com

Ludwig von Mises
New American
New Australian

NewsMax
Opinion Journal
Reuters
Stories

Washington
International
Report Illegal Aliens
VDARE
Wash Times
Wired News

Eaglesup
Information Clearing House
Government Information Awareness
Breaking All the Rules

:: TOTAL INFO ANALYSIS
:: SBGH
:: T A S A
:: THE BLOGFEED
:: INCUBLOGULA
:: POST-ATOMIC
:: BATR BLOG
:: BRAIN WAVES
:: TOTEOTA
:: DEFENSE TECH
:: POPDEX
:: CDC
:: SLA
:: IBIDEM
:: CODSHIT
:: BOTCHCO
:: TECHNOCCULT
:: FUTURESCAN
:: FREE SPEECH NEWS
:: NEW WORLD DISORDER
:: WARBLOGGER WATCH
:: RANDOM ABSTRACT
:: DR. MENLO
:: FALLOUT SHELTER


- DAILY -
:: AFN
:: ALLSouthWestNEWS
:: ANTIWAR.COM
:: APFN
:: ( BLOGDEX )
:: C0BALT.COM
:: CRYPTOME
:: DRT
:: I C H
:: UNKNOWN NEWS
:: VOXFUX
:: WhatReallyHappened

- WEEKLY -
:: AMERICAN FREE PRESS
:: BARTCOP
:: CLOAK & DAGGER
:: DRUGS
:: FREEDOMROX
:: FRIENDS OF LIBERTY
:: GNN
:: HACKTIVISMO
:: THE MEMORY HOLE
:: PoliceState21
:: POLITECH
:: RumorMillNews
:: WIRED NEWS


- MONTHLY -
:: MadCow
:: SKOLNICK
:: DISINFOPEDIA
:: 911 EXPOSED
:: LIGHTSCION
:: d|i|s|i|n|f|o

 

What Google needs to learn from Buzz backlash



Privacy
By Tom Krazit, CNET
February 19, 2010 -- Updated 0322 GMT (1122 HKT)

Google employees and outsiders tested Buzz before its launch. But privacy concerns became issue after it went live.


Google employees and outsiders tested Buzz before its launch. But privacy concerns became issue after it went live.

(CNET) -- Google may have reached the limits of what it can learn from dog food.

Ask almost any technology company what products and services they use within their own organizations, and most will enthusiastically admit to "dog-fooding" their own products. It's both a show of support for their own technology and an opportunity to test those products for flaws that won't make the light of day before they are fixed.

Google is no different. But something went wrong with the dog-fooding process for Google Buzz, forcing company engineers to scramble over a holiday weekend to calm the outcry over privacy violations with tweaks to the settings and set-up process.

Google now asks Buzz users to manually approve their followers instead of automatically including them on their Buzz lists, and improved the visibility of the privacy controls.

Buzz was just tested inside Google before it launched to the general public, said Todd Jackson, Google Buzz product manager. Several layers of Google employees participated in the process, from the initial design team to wider and wider circles of employees.

And a source familiar with the product development process said Google put Buzz through its usability lab, where it brings in outsiders to evaluate products in secret before they are launched.

However, either no one brought up the privacy concerns that Buzz users raised within a day of its launch, Google didn't ask the outsiders for their thoughts on Buzz privacy, or Google engineers dismissed those concerns as unfounded.

For whatever reason, Google has taken a hit over the Buzz launch from a public that is already skeptical about the search giant's motivations with the enormous amount of personal data it already has accumulated.

It is moving quickly to assuage those fears. Buzz and the issues surrounding its launch quickly became the center of attention at Google's weekly meeting for employees on Friday, where tradition holds that employees can speak freely on anything and everything involving the company.

People familiar with the meeting characterized it as full of "strong feelings" that led to Google's weekend push to improve the set-up options for Buzz.

The furor over the Buzz launch will subside, and Web users will turn their attentions to debating the usefulness of the service. However, the incident exposes a real problem for Google: Does its unique culture really understand the markets in which it wants to participate?

Social media has already been a minefield for Google, with stops and starts amid charges that the engineers who built Google don't understand the wider world of social networking.



Complete article here: http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/18/cnet.google.buzz/index.html





 
  Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
 

  Related Links
· More about Privacy
· News by editor


Most read story about Privacy:
FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMPS: Locations and Executive Orders

 

  Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad

 

  Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 

 


Copyright Friends of Liberty 2002-2010